Call for a free consultation
New Jersey 908-301-9001
New York 212-755-3300

NY & NJ Criminal Defense Law Blog

The U.S. Supreme Court Slowly Enters the 21st Century

By Robert G. Stahl Esq., NJ & NY Criminal Defense Lawyer posted in Criminal Defense, Supreme Court, cellphone, Search and Seizure, Cell tower, Fourth Amendment, Privacy Rights on Thursday, June 28, 2018

Supreme Court cell tower search decision privacyLast week’s decision in Carpenter v. United States, a 5-4 decision that the government must obtain a court-authorized warrant for cell site location information (CSLI), is a small step toward recognizing privacy rights in an age of ever-expanding technology. Most people do not realize that their cell phones are capable of tracking their every movement - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. As we move about, our cell phones ping off of the nearest cell tower. Several times a minute our cell phones contact the nearest cell tower. Our cell providers collect and store that information. Examining that information can reveal a person’s daily movements with a fair degree of accuracy, usually within hundreds of feet to a few miles. Each tower has time-stamped records for every cell phone that pinged off of it, and more specifically, which direction on the tower’s multiple
receivers.

Until Carpenter, law enforcement merely needed an order showing reasonable grounds to believe that the records were “relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.” This is a significantly lower standard than what is needed for a court-authorized warrant requiring probable cause. In 2016, Verizon and AT&T had received more than 125,000 requests from law enforcement for CSLI to track citizens’ whereabouts without a warrant.

In its recent decision, the Supreme Court reasoned that the Fourth Amendment – the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause . . . ” - extends to the unintentional providing of cell site information to a third party carrier. The majority held that protecting privacy from new digital technologies is in accord with the founding fathers’ central aim to impede surveillance that is “too permeating”.

Given that there are some 396 million cell phone accounts in the United States, and that most people carry their phones everywhere they go, such protections become of vital importance to us all. Supreme Court cell tower search decision on privacySurveillance techniques are ever expanding. Law enforcement has an arsenal of surveillance tools that have the potential to invade our everyday lives and privacy. Cell phone tracking, GPS trackers on vehicles, license plate readers on police cars, wearable devices such as FitBit, traffic cameras, gunshot detectors, stingray devices and the like all grant an enormous amount of information into our lives that only a few years ago were the stuff of science fiction. Our constitutional safeguards must keep pace with the ever-expanding technology and surveillance.

Robert Stahl, and his firm, Stahl Criminal Defense Lawyers aggressively defend individuals charged with complex federal and state crimes. Founder Robert G. Stahl is recognized as one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the NY/NJ area for his skills, knowledge and success. To contact the firm, call 908.301.9001 for the NJ office and 212.755.3300 for the NYC office, or email Mr. Stahl at rstahl@stahlesq.com.

Tags: Criminal Defense, Supreme Court, cellphone, Search and Seizure, Cell tower, Fourth Amendment, Privacy Rights

Related posts: Sexting, Revenge Porn, and Cyberbullying Can Result in Serious Criminal Penalties The Importance of Pretrial Motions Target Letters and Proffer Agreements Plea Bargaining in the Federal System

Subscribe to Email Updates

RECENT POSTS